Better At vs. Better Than: How GTM Teams Get Out of Their Own Way

GTM teams trip over each other because of culture, not strategy. “Better At” is a mindset that can shift your team from competing for credit to actually getting better at working together. Be “Better At” curiosity, not control; showing up to contribute, not one-upping. If you’re leading a B2B team and you’re tired of the same old drama, this one’s for you.

Takeaways

  • GTM teams break down when people fight for credit instead of solving real problems together.
  • Strained relationships across GTM teams is a trust issue.
  • Being curious, generous, and clear beats being clever, loud, or right.
  • Marketing teams that ask better questions create more value.
  • Better At means improving the team while you improve yourself.

Better At, Not Better Than

We don’t need more clever acronyms or prompts; another playbook or dashboard.

We need braver marketers. People who care more about showing up and improving their tribe.

That’s what Tracy Borreson and I got into during her Crazy Stupid Marketing podcast.

We started with marketing. But the conversation kept pulling us deeper into mindset, culture, and how GTM teams can stop tripping over each other.

Our discussion built on what I shared earlier in this LinkedIn Pulse article and led to a thoughtful question:

What happens when we stop trying to be better THAN each other… and start getting better AT helping each other?

How “Better At” Started

This idea started in a personal place. A strained conversation. A moment that reminded me we’re all just doing our best with what we’ve got.

And a quote from Epictetus.

“These reasonings do not cohere: I am richer than you, therefore I am better than you; I am more eloquent than you, therefore I am better than you. On the contrary these rather cohere: I am richer than you, therefore my possessions are greater than yours; I am more eloquent than you, therefore my speech is superior to yours. But you are neither possession nor speech.”
 
Epictetus, Enchiridion, Chapter 44

That stuck with me.

Being better at something doesn’t make you better than someone.

And if you’re better at something, what if you helped someone else become better at it too? What if they got better at it and showed someone else?

That’s the heart of it.

Better At is about think how we can improve others while improving ourselves.

We grow. We pay it forward. We do the work and learn together.

Why Marketing Needs This Shift Now

There’s an old joke that goes something like this:

How many marketers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Just one. But all the others think they can do it better.

Every aspect of an organization is full of this kind of “better than” behavior, not just marketing.

We chase credit, one-up each other, and cover our asses by throwing each other under the bus. 

We can’t help it. It’s systemic and it starts at an early age.

It kills effectiveness and alignment no matter how efficient or better we think our silos are.

0 Effectiveness X 5 Efficiency = 0

If cross-functional teams can’t co-create value, no amount of leadgen and demandgen will save them.

Better than creates friction. Better at creates connection. 

Creating a culture of curiosity starts by changing what you reward. 

Stop Competing. Start Contributing.

Healthy competition is good. Sports is a good example.

But you can’t win the hearts and minds of your teammates by always competing with them or looking for the “easy button” to make yourself bigger than you are.

AI can help you be better at marketing. But only if it sharpens your thinking, not replaces it.

If your team’s output feels generic, the problem isn’t the tool. It’s the fear behind how it’s being used.

Be generous, empathetic, and useful. Ask better questions. You have to be the change you want to see. That’s how you get better at making better contributions.

Colonel Chris Hadfield quote: Things aren’t scary. People are scared. Every single person you meet is struggling.

Build a “Better At” Culture

If you lead a B2B tech company and this resonates, here are 3 things to consider:

  1. Audit your language. Are your teams talking about credit or contribution? Check your Slack threads, meeting notes, and handoff docs.
  2. Ask the multiplier question. What are we X-times great at, but getting zero return from because we’re not aligned in our thinking?
  3. Run a “Better At” session. Bring in your GTM leaders and ask: Where are we trying to be better than each other, when we could be better at something together?

You don’t need a re-org. You just need a shift in thinking.

When GTM teams work together, the impact shows up in shorter sales cycles, better conversion rates, and less wasted spend.

A Simple Ask

You don’t need to overhaul your GTM strategy overnight. But what if you started asking different questions?

Take these into your next leadership meeting:

  • Are we competing internally, or contributing collectively?
  • What would it look like to be better at partnerships, handoffs, and feedback?
  • Where are we rewarding performance over progress?
  • How are we creating a marketing culture of curiosity, not compliance?
  • And where are we still acting like attribution is more important than alignment?

Better At isn’t a tactic, a course, a playbook. It’s a mindset.

So… where are you trying to be better than, when you could be better at?

Let’s talk about it. 

If you like this content, here are some more ways I can help:

  • Follow me on LinkedIn for bite-sized tips and freebies throughout the week.
  • Work with me. Schedule a call to see if we’re a fit. No obligation. No pressure.
  • Subscribe for ongoing insights and strategies (enter your email below).

Cheers!

This article is AC-A and published on LinkedIn. Join the conversation!